Better child care at non-profit centres By Adele Horin Sydney Morning Herald 9th February 2006 Private for profit child-care centres produce poorer outcomes for children than non-profit centres, a visiting expert says. Gordon
Cleveland, associate professor in economics at the University of
Toronto, and an authority on measuring quality child care, said
yesterday that his research on hundreds of centres showed a 10 to 15
percent “quality boost; in non-profit centres in Canada over private
centres. He said the measurably higher
quality was due to higher staff motivation and effort, not necessarily
to different class sizes or child-staff ratios. “This means a big difference between having good child development and average child development’, he said. Dr Cleveland is a speaker at the National Investment for the Early Years conference being held in Sydney. He
said a cost benefit study of good quality child care in Canada had
shown the benefits exceeded the costs by a margin of two to one. There
were measurable child development benefits, including enhanced school
performance and increased incomes to families through mothers being
able to work. Higher quality centres
produced better outcomes. He said many things contributed to quality in
a centre, including regulated staff ratios, levels of teacher education
and the money available to the centre. His recent research showed
motivation and effort also mattered. “Non-profit
produced higher quality outcomes perhaps because they have a greater
orientation in their philosophy towards development of children and
that feeds through to the staff’, he said. The
conference heard yesterday how the New Zealand Government would provide
20 hours of free preschool to every three to four year old by 2007,
which many experts have urged the Australian state and federal
governments to follow. Helen May,
profesclub phoenixsor of education at he University of Otago, said the
government had also committed to ensuring only trained teachers worked
in child care by 2012.
|